recent reading

Jan. 28th, 2026 12:41
thistleingrey: (Default)
[personal profile] thistleingrey
Across several weeks of wandering---

Richard Osman, The Thursday Murder Club (2020): many words proportional to ambiance/plot, such that I began almost to resent how often my finger had to tap the screen. Though I appreciate how the setting lets Osman juxtapose well-observed characters who wouldn't otherwise acknowledge each other---the members of the old-folks community are more interesting than the middle-aged and younger adults---I couldn't have read this story a few years ago. OTOH, I did finish reading it.

Rena Rossner, The Sisters of the Winter Wood (2018): paused since more than a week ago in ch. 19 (22.5%). I ran out of curiosity there. If I want the story to be doing a bit more than it does, that's a me-problem.

Nell Irvin Painter, Old in Art School (2019): paused at 5% to save up Painter's voice, for times when I'm pickier. Painter retired from teaching at Princeton to undertake a BFA and MFA at RISD. My classes are remote, my degree smaller and briefer, and I'm not 67 yet (Painter's age upon pivoting), but it's lovely to find an aware fellow-traveler in her text.

I've reached 68% in Grace Cho's Tastes Like War, up from 20something %.

I've DNFed Sherry Thomas's A Ruse of Shadows at 4%, which may be a record---it's within the reprise of recent events. I ran out of curiosity there.

I've dipped into Carolyn Lei-lanilau's Ono-Ono Girl's Hula (1997), whose short publisher's page erases her and me as potential readers: "If you think you know something about what multiculturalism means in real life, read Carolyn Lei-lanilau and think again." Eh, bite me. The title indicates performance outright, so being irritated by yet another trifle constructed for mainstream readers is a me-problem. Either I'll get over it before the library wants the book back, or I won't.

I'm currently at 10% of Skull Water by Heinz Insu Fenkl (2023), a continuation of Memories of My Ghost Brother.
[syndicated profile] fanhackers_feed

Posted by aninfiniteweirdo

Another Transformative Approach to Fan Identity

When speaking of the possibility of K-pop stans transforming their fannish identity and negotiating their identification with their idols, inherent in the discussion is the racism and cultural appropriation of the industry and fandom that affords different possibilities to Black and non-Black fans. While the difference between South Korean and North Korean fans is how the different structure of fandom means a certain relation between the fannish identity and the object of the fannishness, the discussion about racism and cultural appropriation points out the relation between the the fannish identity and fans’ racialized identities, which no structure of fandom can erase. Otebele uncovers these relations for us.


For many non-Korean or South Korean–based fans of K-pop, distance is a defining factor in their interaction with the industry. For Black fans, this distance is not only physical but also formed by industry practices that contribute to their abjection. (…) The ceremony for such divorce between fandom and racial discourse marks an impossibility for Black K-pop fans who may find that pleasure in the media object rests in the fractured space between fan and antifan.


This impossibility is dissolved in a dream in which fannish identity and racialized identity, fan and anti-fan can be clearly separated. White fans are allowed to express their fascination and frustration as part of their fannishness, while Black fans’ vigil labor, a term coined by Otobele, is seen as placing them outside of this same fannishness.


Here, by speaking back to the K-pop industry and non-Black fans, these creators deploy vigil labor to demonstrate the potentiality of Black fan power in resisting fandom expectations and negotiating the fluid boundaries of being fans. (…) This resistance defies established modes of being a fan, placing critique not only on media objects but also on fandom and, doing so, through its transformative creations.


Otobele here points out that vigil labor actually obscures the boundaries of fan and anti-fan: it is transformative work and critique at the same time. Vigil labor creates value for the fans whose pleasure of fandom is disrupted by racism, the term an important addition to the theory of resistant fandom practices or might even be completely new lens through which we can view this theory.


Otebele, Osarugue. 2024. “The (Anti)fan is Black: Consumption, Resistance and Black K-Pop Fan Vigil Labor.” In “Centering Blackness in Fan Studies,” guest edited by Alfred L. Martin Jr. and Matt Griffin, special issue, Transformative Works and Cultures, no. 44. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2024.2465.

hoods all alike

Jan. 22nd, 2026 16:22
thistleingrey: (Default)
[personal profile] thistleingrey
While looking at hood patterns, I found a free-to-use DROPS pattern (Jan 2025) on which another designer seems to've based a mystery knit-along, fall 2025. Making a pattern tougher to knit does not constitute an individual contribution worth charging money for. I've decided not to link.

Pattern design generally, or sometimes "design," has become a rather crowded space in the video-influencer micro-era. Here's a random video in which someone gives the spotlight to free patterns that bear close resemblance to 15 PetiteKnit patterns.

The hood search and current events have reminded me, however---there is one hat pattern that hasn't been awful to wear. I knitted it for my uncle almost 10 years ago, before my last visit, and since he and I were not so different in size (I'm taller, he had heavier bones), I tried it on while modifying the pattern to fit him despite thinner yarn. I bet I could make myself one. Not the same silhouette as the ice-melting toques people are promoting, which evoke a specific moment, but more practical for my head shape.
[syndicated profile] fanhackers_feed

Posted by fanhackers-mods

In the coming weeks, I’m going to do a bit of a tour around acafandom’s research outlets and platforms - by which I mean journals, presses, book series, archives: places where you might find work you’re interested in (or submit work you’re creating yourself!)

Today’s post will be about journals: these are typically peer-reviewed (the better the journal, the more peer-reviewed and the blinder the peer review).  Fan studies now has field-specific journals, but there are journals in other fields that have always been particularly friendly to fan studies work. (If you know of a journal that I should spotlight, please comment!) 

Transformative Works and Cultures - https://journal.transformativeworks.org/index.php/twc

I can’t help but start, maternally, with the OTW’s own flagship journal, Transformative Works and Cultures.  This Diamond Open Access journal has been publishing consistently and on time since it was founded in 2007. (If you’re not an academic, you don’t know how rare that is! Academic time is glacial and things often come out really late - not TWC!)  

“TWC publishes articles about transformative works, broadly conceived, as well as articles about the fan community. We invite papers in all areas, including fan fiction, fan vids, film, TV, anime, fan art, comic books, cosplay, fan community, music, video games, celebrities and machinima, and encourage a variety of critical approaches, including feminism, gender studies, queer theory, postcolonial theory, audience theory, reader-response theory, literary criticism, film studies, and posthumanism. We also encourage authors to consider writing personal essays integrated with scholarship; hyperlinked articles; or other forms that test the limits of academic writing.”

Sample work:
Kennedy, Kimberly. 2024. “‘It’s Not Your Tumblr’: Commentary-Style Tagging Practices in Fandom Communities.” In “Fandom and Platforms,” edited by Maria K. Alberto, Effie Sapuridis, and Lesley Willard, special issue, Transformative Works and Cultures, no. 42. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2024.2475.

Journal of Fandom Studies - https://www.intellectbooks.com/journal-of-fandom-studies

The Journal of Fandom Studies is subscription-based, so access is best gotten through a library that subscribes to it. (Or - hot insider tip - if you need an article, typically if you write to the scholar/author they will share a copy with you. Scholars live to be cited! :D) 

“The Journal of Fandom Studies seeks to offer scholars a dedicated, peer-reviewed publication that promotes current scholarship into the fields of fan and audience studies across a variety of media. We focus on the critical exploration, within a wide range of disciplines and fan cultures, of issues surrounding production and consumption of popular media (including film, music, television, sports and gaming).”

Sample work:
Oh, Chuyun. 2015. Queering spectatorship in K-pop: The androgynous male dancing body and western female fandom.Journal of Fandom Studies,  Volume 3, Issue 1, Mar 2015, p. 59 - 78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs.3.1.59_1

Journal of Cinema and Media Studies - https://www.cmstudies.org/page/jcms and  https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jcms

The Journal of Cinema and Media Studies - previously called Cinema Journal - has long been friendly to fan studies scholarship. Many sections are open access, including the “In Focus” section, and the journal is typically available as part of the Project Muse database in libraries.

“JCMS’s basic mission is to foster engaged debate and rigorous thinking among humanities scholars of film, television, digital media, and other audiovisual technologies. We are committed to the aesthetic, political, and cultural interpretation of these media and their production, circulation, and reception. To that end, JCMS is dedicated to intellectual diversity of all kinds.”

Sample work:
Anselmo, Diana W.  2022. “Picture Pain: Anti-Heteronormative Female Fandom in Early Hollywood,” JCMS: Journal of Cinema and Media Studies. Volume 62, Issue 1, pp. 7-35. doi: 10.1353/cj.2022.0061

M/C Journal - https://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal

M/C Journal was founded (as “M/C – A Journal of Media and Culture”) in 1998 as a place of public intellectualism analysing and critiquing the meeting of media and culture. M/C Journal is a fully blind-, peer-reviewed academic journal, open to submissions from anyone.

Sample work:
Svegaard, S. F. K., & Vilkins, S. (2025). “Fandom and Politics.”M/C Journal, 28(3). Retrieved from https://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/3190

cutting the warp

Jan. 18th, 2026 11:39
thistleingrey: (Default)
[personal profile] thistleingrey
1a. I've bought the Stoorstålka "advanced" and "professional" kits after all, for practicing basic Baltic pickup with zero context.
recent tries at weaving )

3. Weaving as a diversion has paused. The process of warping a second inkle attempt and weaving it off has shown me that my vast ignorance crosses understanding how something can function and getting one's fingers to do it at a strange angle. In sport-weight cotton yarn, most of my 2" = 5 cm band looks as neat and even as the stuff that Etsy-shop vloggers show themselves making on Instagram or TikTok; I'm a fumbling beginner with peripheral neuropathy only for starting and ending. Sew the ends under, and no one would see---but learning to make tidy starts and finishes is more than my current hands could endure.

I dipped back into weaving specifically to practice being a beginner at something. Having learned a few things since I was a knitting beginner (almost 20 years ago) regarding dexterity, mobility workarounds, how other people do various fibercrafts including forms of weaving, and how plant and animal fibers behave, the on-ramp for my hands-on weaving is quite short. Like, that's it, I'm already into an objectively intermediate stage, and my hands cannot do what would need doing there.


4. Crocheting has always been tougher on my joints than knitting, or rather, my best refinements over time of self-accommodation for each craft succeed better for knitting. Weaving at narrow output (tabletop, backstrap, inkle) demands less of any individual body part than crochet or knit because it's better distributed across many parts---but weaving wants specific actions that need fingers, not fingernail-substitution or the use of an external tool.

I can tie square and surgeon knots with my nails (lacking usual-range fingertip sensation), but the junk comm packets I wrote about a few years ago, whereby since #2020 my brain or central nervous system directs a limb to do something and it fails to report back timely, or CNS forgets momentarily that the limb exists---junk buildup is still a thing. Trying to weave more, doggedly doing more by eye, would mean accumulating more of a junk backlog than I have the capacity to expel (nap/resting self-accommodations). Weaving and laptop typing and food prep occupy the same bucket, just about. So, weaving drops out, at least for now.

(Knitting is still fine in moderation.)

Profile

ahorbinski: shelves stuffed with books (Default)
Andrea J. Horbinski

August 2017

S M T W T F S
   1 2345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags