ahorbinski: A DJ geisha (historical time is a construct)
"Foxes not only live on the boundaries, they cross them. And by crossing, they challenge them. The cultural elaborations of the fox in Japan position it to mediate between the human and the animal and the human and the divine. TO be fully human is to know where one stands in relation to both the animal world and the divine. This does not happen automatically but is a culturally conditioned process through which each person passes. One learns where the boundaries are not merely through their description, but by hearing stories of the consequences of daring to test them or cross them. It should not surprise us to learn that when a Kyôgen actor in Japan makes the transition from apprentice to master, he does so in the role of the fox. … So, too, all Japanese people, in an unmarked, perhaps unconscious way, have to position themselves in their various roles. And the cultural symbol of the fox shows them where some of the social boundaries lie."

--Karen Smyers, The Fox and the Jewel: Shared and Private Meanings in Contemporary Japanese Inari Worship (189-90)
This really was just an unassumingly brilliant book.


I got up early yesterday to do a podcast with Ed Sizemore of mangaworthreading.com on Hagio Moto's new collection of manga shorts in English, A Drunken Dream. The four of us had a really good conversation; I'll post the link here when Ed uploads the audio.

ahorbinski: A snakes & ladders board.  (struggle & stagger)
Administrators preoccupied with the alliance between the university and global capital are nearly indifferent to the disciplines in the humanities and social sciences. Now that capitalism has reached beyond the stage of nation-statism, its dependence on the nation-based academic disciplines is perceived, as has already been mentioned, to be less strategic by the university administrators as well as students, academic managers, and consumers. Those who are in the humanities, on the other hand, are preoccupied with cultural studies, identity politics, and postcolonial studies, as if oblivious to the real crisis of the humanities in the university, their erasure. They determinedly avoid facing the crucial issues of the ongoing exploitation of the poor and the powerless of the world. The question to be asked now is, Can civilization afford to discard the practice of self-criticism, if that is what the humanities are largely to be concerned with?

--Masao Miyoshi, "The University and the 'Global Economy'," in Japan After Japan (61)
This is directly related to this phenomenon of global capital breaking down the friction of the entrenched university system, which, as Dipesh Chakrabarty makes clear, is or was thoroughly implicated in the nation-state system. Leave it to the neoliberal order of global capital to make implication in the nation-state system something for which to feel nostalgia. 

It need hardly be said, I hope, that I hope to at the least keep these issues clear in my mind in my scholarship, if I cannot directly do anything about them. But I will assuredly do what I can. 
ahorbinski: A DJ geisha (historical time is a construct)
At bottom, all historical practice is an act of criticism. At the same time that theory enables us to imagine the framing operation involved in the formulation of any analytic program, it must teach us that our own perspectives possess no privilege over others, since its power lies precisely in the capacity to make visible the frames from which our categories of representation derive. In this way, historical criticism can never be far from political purpose.

--Harry D. Harootunian, Things Seen and Unseen: Discourse and Ideology in Tokugawa Nativism (2)
I really can't understate how much I agree with this. Historiography is an act of narrative, and as such its schemes of representation are no more immune from the operations of critical theory than literature, or life. 
ahorbinski: hulk smash male privilege! (hulk smash male privilege)
Taught to read and write inside the stories of Christian salvation history and technoscientific progress, I am neither heretic, infidel, nor Jew, but I am a marked woman informed by those literacies as well as by those given to me by birth and education. Shaped as an insider and an outsider to the hegemonic powers and discourses of my European and North American legacies, I remember that anti-Semitism and misogyny intensified in the Renaissance and Scientific Revolution of early modern Europe, that racism and colonialism flourished in the traveling habits of the cosmopolitan Enlightenment, and that the intensified misery of billions of men and women seems organically rooted in the freedoms of transnational capitalism and technoscience. But I also remember the dreams and achievements of contingent freedoms, situated knowledges, and relief of suffering that are inextricable from this contaminated triple historical heritage. I remain a child of the Scientific Revolution, the Enlightenment, and technoscience. My modest witness cannot ever be simply oppositional. Rather, s/he is suspicious, implicated, knowing, ignorant, worried, and hopeful. Inside the net of stories, agencies, and instruments that constitute technoscience, s/he is committed to learning how to avoid both the narratives and realities of the Net that threaten her world at the end of the Second Christian Millennium. S/he is seeking to learn and practice the mixed literacies and differential consciousness that are more faithful to the way the world, including the world of technoscience, actually works.

--Donna Haraway, Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.
FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience
(2-3)
ahorbinski: My Marxist-feminist dialectic brings all the boys to the yard.  (marxism + feminism --> posthumanism)
[personal profile] nummulite posted what is possibly the best sentence I have read in years yesterday:
Not infrequently in the 1980s the French mandarin school of social history flaunted intellectualization like a boulevard weapon of self-promotion and succumbed to dancing the seven veils of post-Marxism on the tables of the Left Bank cafes to court the younger Parisian generation.

--Norman F. Cantor, Inventing the Middle Ages
Historiography: because you can't make this shit up. (And which Left Bank cafes were they?)

I'm making a tag based on it. I don't even know what I'll use it for, but it's too good to pass up. (Hell, it would make a great book title, even.)
ahorbinski: A snakes & ladders board.  (struggle & stagger)
Let no one forget modernity's appalling wounds--the achievement of economies of scale in officially sanctioned slaughter, the induced hatreds and ignorance, the profligate and systematic waste (and neglect) of human skills and good faith. It is an open question whether they can be healed by modern people, using the instruments of modernity alone. Perhaps these instruments--of production in all spheres, but especially the institutions and technologies of communication and representative democracy--will someday be surpassed in a postmodern revolution that enhances "local humanities," cushions societies against the vicissitudes of the market, and discloses a new form of political community beyond the simultaneously integrative and atomizing force of the contemporary state. Perhaps, one must always hope.
----------
The modern world, therefore, makes two contradictory promises to those who live in it. First, its fundamental processes--processes specific to itself--can be grasped via abstraction, but second, once so grasped these processes assume license to rule over those who created them. Thus the "contract" at the heart of modernity is not only between people, that is, a matter of institutional arrangements, but also between people and their own ideas. Abstraction is leviathan.

--Andrew E. Barshay, The Social Sciences in Modern Japan: The Marxian and Modernist Traditions (6, 9)
It was really nice to come across this passage while reading this book, because this is exactly the attitude I wanted in my professors at graduate school. My fellow grad students and I, however, and even my undergrad advisor and I, continue to go around about modernity and its discontents and its undeniable benefits--antibiotics and vaccines, to be precise; even as a fairly healthy kid, I can think of several occasions on which I probably would have died without modern medicine, and I suspect most other people can say the same about themselves or about a family member. This doesn't mean I don't fundamentally endorse Barshay's view of "modernity's appalling wounds," because they're all true; but it's always more complicated. And if we ever do manage to get beyond post- and modernity, we should not then forget their (limited) good along with all their manifest ill.
ahorbinski: kanji (kanji)
Negative portrayals of Westerners began in the early sixteenth century, when the first Portuguese traders appeared on the southern coast of China and committed random acts of pillage and homicide. […] In the eighteenth century, as I have pointed out, the supercargoes of the British East India Company repeatedly got in trouble with the local government for homicides committed by Europeans against the Cantonese "natives." It was these acts of violence, rather than the exotic appearance of the Westerners, that had contributed to the rise of the epithets fan gui and gui zi ["foreign devils"] among the Cantonese and their spread to the rest of the country after the first Opium War.

--Lydia H. Liu, The Clash of Empires: The Invention of China in Modern World Making (98-99)

Yeah, my reaction is "What the hell is wrong with these people?" too.
ahorbinski: A snakes & ladders board.  (struggle & stagger)
In 1098 Crusader destruction of the Syrian town of Ma'arra had been accompanied by acknowledged acts of Frankish cannibalism. Graphically described in the chronicle of Radulph of Caen (he admits that "In Ma'arra our troops boiled pagan adults in cooking pots; they impaled children on spits and devoured them grilled"), they were later "justified" in a letter sent to the Pope by the Christian commander, who blamed the lapse on extreme hunger. Needless to say, this excuse was dismissed by Arab historians who continued to describe their bloodthirsty enemies as eaters not only of people, but, what was worse, even of dogs, considered the uncleanest of species (Maalouf, 1984: 39-40).

--Janet Abu-Lughod, Before European Hegemony (107)
 
History: because you can't make this shit up.

Profile

ahorbinski: shelves stuffed with books (Default)
Andrea J. Horbinski

August 2017

S M T W T F S
   1 2345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags